MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Mitchell Krueger [141st] vs Hudson Rivera [] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Krueger 2 - 0 Rivera

They have played 5 sets in total, with Krueger winning 4 and Rivera winning 1. The last match between Krueger and Rivera was at the Stanford Challenger, 12-08-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-1 7-6(2).

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Mitchell Krueger 2
Hudson Rivera 0
Krueger vs Rivera H2H Profile
Krueger Stats Rivera
48% (10-11) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
2 Head-to-Head 0
141 Ranking N/A
135 Highest Rank N/A
31 Age 20
R Plays -
9 Titles 0
53% (433-386) Career Total W/L 47% (17-19)
$1,082,108 Career Prize Money $0
2 Hard H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Krueger VS Rivera H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-1 7-6(2)
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Hudson Rivera
63% ( 34 of 54)
1st Serve %
58% ( 51 of 88)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
82% ( 28 of 34)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 30 of 51)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 15 of 37)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
22% ( 12 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 43 of 88)
85
Total Points Won
57
3-6 6-1 6-2
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Hudson Rivera
63% ( 40 of 63)
1st Serve %
58% ( 43 of 74)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
88% ( 35 of 40)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 24 of 43)
48% ( 11 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 15 of 31)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
27% ( 17 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 35 of 74)
81
Total Points Won
56

Krueger VS Rivera H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Krueger Vs Rivera H2H Stats
Mitchell Krueger Krueger Stats Hudson Rivera Rivera
2 H2H Matches 0
4 Sets Won 1
28 Games Won 16
5 Aces (Total) 3
5 Total Double Faults 12
1:39:17 Average Match Time 1:39:17
63% (74/117) 1st Serve % 58% (94/162)
85% (63/74) 1st Serve Win % 57% (54/94)
58% (25/43) 2nd Serve Win % 44% (30/68)
40% (8/20) Break Points Won % (Total) 29% (2/7)
48% (78/162) Return Points Win % 25% (29/117)
100% (2/2) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/2)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (1/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Mitchell Krueger vs Hudson Rivera Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Krueger 2 - 0 Rivera

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 48.75% of points on their second serve, while Rivera has won 32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 48.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rivera has won 60.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.5% and 20.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 57.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rivera has saved 75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 51.52% of matches played (W/L 34/ 32), with Rivera winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 120/ 93), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15). Rivera has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 17/ 19), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 17/ 19).
  • Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18), where as Rivera has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krueger winning 2 times and Rivera being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Krueger winning 4 and Rivera winning 1. The last match between Krueger and Rivera was at the Stanford Challenger, 12-08-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-1 7-6(2).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:17.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Rivera have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 1 times and Rivera 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 1, and Rivera 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 231.88 while Rivera has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rivera has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 37.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rivera has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Mathys Erhard
    Player
    Mitchell Krueger
    67% ( 85 of 127)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 84 of 127)
    13
    Aces
    4
    5
    Double Faults
    3
    69% ( 59 of 85)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 57 of 84)
    52% ( 22 of 42)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 24 of 43)
    20% ( 2 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    36% ( 46 of 127)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 46 of 127)
    127
    Total Points Won
    127
    L
    4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Mitchell Krueger
    Player
    Geoffrey Blancaneaux
    56% ( 49 of 87)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 57 of 108)
    2
    Aces
    3
    4
    Double Faults
    5
    69% ( 34 of 49)
    1st Serve Won
    75% ( 43 of 57)
    47% ( 18 of 38)
    2nd Serve Won
    51% ( 26 of 51)
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    75% ( 6 of 8)
    40% ( 35 of 87)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 39 of 108)
    91
    Total Points Won
    104
    W
    0-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Mitchell Krueger
    Player
    Facundo Mena
    58% ( 39 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    46% ( 38 of 82)
    1
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    67% ( 26 of 39)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    57% ( 16 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 17 of 44)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    22% ( 2 of 9)
    37% ( 25 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 40 of 82)
    82
    Total Points Won
    67
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Andres Andrade
    Player
    Mitchell Krueger
    56% ( 38 of 68)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 41 of 64)
    4
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 27 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 28 of 41)
    60% ( 18 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 9 of 23)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    34% ( 23 of 68)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 27 of 64)
    72
    Total Points Won
    60
    L
    7-5 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Mitchell Krueger
    Player
    Joel Schwaerzler
    63% ( 45 of 72)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 58 of 83)
    3
    Aces
    8
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    76% ( 34 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 35 of 58)
    56% ( 15 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 13 of 25)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    32% ( 23 of 72)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 35 of 83)
    84
    Total Points Won
    71
    W
    7-6(2) 7-6(5) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Kei Nishikori
    Player
    Mitchell Krueger
    77% ( 44 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 31 of 48)
    4
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    77% ( 34 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 19 of 31)
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 8 of 17)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    32% ( 18 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 21 of 48)
    60
    Total Points Won
    45
    L
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Mitchell Krueger
    Player
    Patrick Zahraj
    67% ( 52 of 78)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 32 of 62)
    5
    Aces
    4
    4
    Double Faults
    4
    60% ( 31 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    46% ( 12 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 13 of 30)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    45% ( 35 of 78)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 29 of 62)
    72
    Total Points Won
    68
    W
    6-7(5) 5-3 ret. H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Mitchell Krueger
    Player
    Toby Alex Kodat
    52% ( 25 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 37 of 62)
    3
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    80% ( 20 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 26 of 37)
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 12 of 25)
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    35% ( 17 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 24 of 62)
    55
    Total Points Won
    55
    W
    5-7 3-1 ret. H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Camilo Ugo Carabelli
    Player
    Mitchell Krueger
    67% ( 53 of 79)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 50 of 81)
    5
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    79% ( 42 of 53)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 33 of 50)
    46% ( 12 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 17 of 31)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    32% ( 25 of 79)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 31 of 81)
    85
    Total Points Won
    75
    L
    6-2 3-6 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Mikhail Kukushkin
    Player
    Mitchell Krueger
    70% ( 65 of 93)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 60 of 93)
    4
    Aces
    8
    4
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 46 of 65)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 38 of 60)
    46% ( 13 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 14 of 33)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    37% ( 34 of 93)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 41 of 93)
    100
    Total Points Won
    86
    L
    5-7 7-6(2) 6-0 H2H

    Hudson Rivera Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Antreas Djakouris
    Player
    Hudson Rivera
    39% ( 24 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 42 of 67)
    2
    Aces
    1
    5
    Double Faults
    3
    79% ( 19 of 24)
    1st Serve Won
    76% ( 32 of 42)
    39% ( 15 of 38)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 8 of 25)
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    45% ( 28 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 27 of 67)
    61
    Total Points Won
    68
    L
    6-4 1-6 10-7 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-1 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Skander Mansouri
    Player
    Hudson Rivera
    63% ( 41 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 51 of 85)
    12
    Aces
    2
    6
    Double Faults
    4
    88% ( 36 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 37 of 51)
    50% ( 12 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 17 of 34)
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    26% ( 17 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 31 of 85)
    79
    Total Points Won
    71
    L
    1-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Mitchell Krueger
    Player
    Hudson Rivera
    63% ( 34 of 54)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 51 of 88)
    3
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    8
    82% ( 28 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 30 of 51)
    70% ( 14 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 15 of 37)
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    22% ( 12 of 54)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 43 of 88)
    85
    Total Points Won
    57
    L
    6-1 7-6(2) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Bryce Nakashima
    Player
    Hudson Rivera
    75% ( 42 of 56)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 35 of 63)
    13
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    6
    83% ( 35 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    69% ( 24 of 35)
    50% ( 7 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    54% ( 15 of 28)
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    25% ( 14 of 56)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 24 of 63)
    66
    Total Points Won
    53
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jaimee Floyd Angele
    Player
    Hudson Rivera
    61% ( 31 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 35 of 63)
    6
    Aces
    4
    7
    Double Faults
    4
    81% ( 25 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 26 of 35)
    60% ( 12 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 12 of 28)
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    27% ( 14 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 25 of 63)
    62
    Total Points Won
    52
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Quinn Vandecasteele
    Player
    Hudson Rivera
    59% ( 44 of 74)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 31 of 60)
    9
    Aces
    0
    5
    Double Faults
    9
    82% ( 36 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 20 of 31)
    40% ( 12 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 12 of 29)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 6)
    35% ( 26 of 74)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 28 of 60)
    76
    Total Points Won
    58
    L
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Kareem Allaf
    Player
    Hudson Rivera
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 42 of 72)
    5
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    7
    87% ( 26 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 28 of 42)
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 12 of 30)
    20% ( 3 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    28% ( 15 of 54)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 32 of 72)
    71
    Total Points Won
    55
    L
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Hudson Rivera
    Player
    Kousuke Ogura
    59% ( 44 of 75)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 36 of 56)
    13
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    68% ( 30 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 21 of 36)
    45% ( 14 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 11 of 20)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    41% ( 31 of 75)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 24 of 56)
    68
    Total Points Won
    63
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    QF
    L
    3-6 6-4 10-2 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Krueger & Rivera Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Mitchell Krueger Krueger Stats Hudson Rivera Rivera
    53% (433/386) Win/Loss 47% (17/19)
    53% (1023/908) Sets Win/Loss 51% (43/42)
    51% (9450/9024) Games Win/Loss 50% (421/416)
    0.31 Aces Per Game 0.17
    2815 Aces Total 68
    0.18 Double Faults Per Game 0.23
    1651 Total Double Faults 94
    1:22:53 Average Match Time 1:4:15
    517.57 Average Opponent Rank 408.5
    62% (29177/47317) 1st Serve % 60% (966/1613)
    69% (20178/29177) 1st Serve Win % 66% (638/966)
    51% (9219/18140) 2nd Serve Win % 47% (302/647)
    41% (1779/4308) Break Points Won % (Total) 42% (50/118)
    38% (18301/47732) Return Points Win % 36% (533/1461)
    53% (422/802) Best of 3 Sets Win % 47% (17/36)
    55% (6/11) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
    46% (129/278) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 60% (6/10)
    45% (127/284) Deciding Set Win % 31% (4/13)
    81% (442/358) 1st Set Won, Won Match 70% (20/14)
    19% (442/84) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 30% (20/6)
    19% (377/71) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 19% (16/3)

    Other Predictions

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...